Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
ad 1: the main point was: pronouns describe sex, not gender (unlike what the sjw narrative suggests)

ad 2: not "evil" according to the article, but probably willfully dishonest to propagate the unscientific notion of a "blank slate" (can highly recommend steven pinker's book with this title) and social constructionism. also, an accusation of bias does nothing without proper argumentation.

ad 3: yes

> what's the reason then for dresses being considered 'feminine'?
the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex

what do you think one can't talk about without using the concept of "gender" but only describing things via sex? plus, i'd like you to please give me your preferred definition of "gender". thanks.

Don't be the product, buy the product!